Ein Klassiker kehrt zurück

Der von STAEDTLER Deutsch­land bis 1990 pro­du­zierte Druck­blei­stift MARS-​MICROGRAPH F 770 1x1 kehrt zurück. Unter dem Namen F 770 1x N wird er von STAEDTLER Japan ab Ende Sep­tem­ber in vier Strich­stär­ken zum Preis von knapp 10 Euro, aber aus­schließ­lich auf dem japa­ni­schen Markt erhält­lich sein.

Beim Design hat man sich an der zwei­ten Gene­ra­tion des Stifts mit etwas kür­ze­rer Spitze gehal­ten, bei der jede Strich­stärke einen eige­nen Blau­ton hatte. Den Fotos2 nach hat die Neu­auf­lage3 eine fei­nere Rän­de­lung des Griff­stücks als das Ori­gi­nal und die Ringe für die Strich­stärke nicht mehr in der Mitte der Spitze, son­dern näher am Griff. – Dem 1978 ein­ge­führ­ten 770 F 1x kommt eine beson­dere Stel­lung zu, war er doch der erste Druck­blei­stift von STAEDTLER mit gerän­del­tem Metall-​Griffstück und Härtegradindikator.

  1. Mit x = 3, 5, 7 oder 9 für die Strich­stärke in 1/​10 mm.
  2. Im ers­ten Foto sieht man als Deko­ra­tion lose Blät­ter des Kin­der­buchs „Anne of Green Gab­les“ von Lucy Maud Mont­go­mery aus dem Jahr 1908. Warum hat man das gewählt?
  3. In der Mel­dung heißt es (maschi­nell über­setzt): „Es gab einige Teile, die mit der heu­ti­gen Tech­no­lo­gie nicht her­ge­stellt wer­den konn­ten, so dass es schwie­rig war, sie her­zu­stel­len, und schließ­lich wurde er in die­sem Jahr neu auf­ge­legt.“ Ich frage mich, auf wel­che Teile des 770 F 1x man sich damit bezieht.

11 Kommentare zu „Ein Klassiker kehrt zurück“

  1. Won­derful news! I would really love to have one of those in my stash. Honestly, I kind of pre­fer the Ger­man design ethos to that of the Japa­nese, spe­ci­ally regar­ding Staedt­ler (pre­fer the 780 lead hol­der to the 925 for example).

    Quite weird to read that they couldn’t repro­duce cer­tain parts with “modern tech­no­logy”. Guess what they really meant to say is that modern tech­no­logy is unable to repli­cate cer­tain craft­sman­ship abili­ties that cost-​cutting bean coun­ters made sure were lost forever. 

    What’s your take on the Hexa­go­nal mecha­ni­cal pen­cil from Staedt­ler Japan?

  2. Yes, that really is won­derful news!

    I don’t know if you can really compare the 780 with the 925 x5 20. The design of the 780 dates back to the 1970s and that of the 925 to the 2000s (and 30 years is a long time). In addi­tion, both have a dif­fe­rent mecha­nism and a dif­fe­rent appli­ca­tion background.

    I’m not sure what they really mean with “couldn’t repro­duce cer­tain parts with modern tech­no­logy” but I’m plea­sed that they have at least tried to make the pen­cil as true to the ori­gi­nal as pos­si­ble. – I’d love to dis­as­sem­ble a new and an old 780 F 1x and to compare them! And I wouldn’t be sur­pri­sed if the new ver­sion had a simp­ler con­s­truc­tion and was a little lighter.

    At first I was very inte­res­ted in STAEDTLER’s hexa­go­nal pen­cil but the but so far the chatty label­ling and the rub­ber (?) coa­ting has put me off, also the fact that they made the blue one a limi­ted edi­tion. This Lumograph-​like design shoud have been the stan­dard ver­sion! Howe­ver, the mate­rial and work­man­ship qua­lity is said to be very good so maybe I’ll decide to buy it after all. Do you have one?

  3. Not com­pa­ring them, I sim­ply pre­fer old-​school Staedt­lers than the modern Japa­nese versions.

    And yes, am sure the new 780 F will be ligh­ter and simp­ler. But will it be better?

    Orde­red the Hexa­go­nal pen­cil, but I saw a few reviews that alert about paint-​chipping issues, and the click mecha­nism having some issues. So I can­cel­led the order and went for the Dreh­grif­fel. Let’s see how good that one is.

  4. Yes, the are really old school, and I’m happy that they have retai­ned the basic design of the 780 and are still offe­ring this clas­sic leadholder.

    The old 770 F 1x had a few fea­tures that could be impro­ved. For exam­ple, the metal of the handle did not age beau­tifully, but became unsightly in some cases. The pla­s­tic used for the bar­rel dis­co­lou­red quite quickly when expo­sed to sun­light, espe­ci­all the light blue of the 0.3 mm vari­ant, and if I remem­ber cor­rectly, the lead advance per click was quite large, which was not so prac­ti­cal, espe­ci­ally at 0.3 mm. So there is a pos­si­bi­lity that the new ver­sion is an improvement!

    Paint chip­ping and issues with the mecha­nism? This sounds bad, and it’s not some­thing you would want from a big-​name manu­fac­tu­rer. Howe­ver, I suspect that these were iso­la­ted cases because I haven’t heard of these pro­blems yet.

    I’m curious to know what you think about the Drehgriffel!

  5. That’s a shame. My ‘70s TK-​Fine pen­cils are defect-​free. Both those with metal grips and those with pla­s­tic. I was hoping for the 770 to be the same.

    Pla­s­tics of the 60’s and 70’s tend to be quite a risk. Have many pens and pen­cils from that age that eit­her dis­co­lor, deform or crack with time. For exam­ple, I own a cou­ple of Mexican-​made Peli­kan Peli­ka­nos that found NOS. When I star­ted using them, I noti­ced that after a few car­tridge swaps, their sec­tions star­ted to leak, upon clo­ser inspec­tion, it tur­ned out to have deve­lo­ped tiny little cracks close to stress points that grew with con­tin­ued use. I no lon­ger use them, which is a shame cause their stainless-​steel nibs, which are German-​made, write beau­tifully. I keep one in untouched con­di­tion, thou.

    As for the Hexa­go­nal, paint chip­ping might be iso­la­ted, but there are many comm­ents on Red­dit and some Dis­cord chats that speak of a pro­blem extra­c­ting lead. There seems to be a rub­ber com­po­nent on the tip that fails even­tually. Also, the grey ver­sion -which is the one afforda­ble and available to me, is kind of underwhelming.

    The Dreh­grif­fel comes tomor­row. Will let you know my take on it. BTW have you seen or used the Staedt­ler 766TRX mecha­ni­cal pen­cil? Seems to also have a knob-​turning mecha­nism as Leuchtturm’s and is made in Germany.

  6. Regar­ding the bar­rel cracks: I was only refer­ring to the M5-​50 Hi-​Pitch and the TK 9555 (for­t­u­na­tely mine are OK); I haven’t encoun­te­red cracks in other old Mitsu­bi­shi and Faber-​Castell pencils.

    Yes, old pla­s­tic can offer many unp­lea­sant sur­pri­ses. Inci­den­tally, a small era­ser crumb recently stuck to an older STAEDTLER MARS 780 over night and reac­ted with it, lea­ving traces (I suspect it was the pla­s­ti­ciser in the era­ser). – I’m sorry to hear about your Peli­ka­nos. What a pity!

    I will try to find out more about that issue with the rub­ber part in the tip of the STAEDTLER Hexa­go­nal; it sounds like it’s about the lead retai­ner (which would be very annoy­ing). – And yes, the grey ver­sion looks pretty boring.

    No, I don’t know the STAEDTLER 766TRX since I don’t use 0.7 mm and don’t like such distinc­tive three-​sided designs. I won­der which mecha­nism it uses.

  7. That is an ama­zing news! I really wan­ted to buy one, but the cur­rent price for this old pen­cil is very prohibitive.
    I hope they start to bring back their old pencils.
    If they deci­ded to make a come­back of the 925 95, it would be like my dreams coming true!

  8. The Dreh­grif­fel is finally here and I’ve been using it for almost two days now. I’m a bit ambi­va­lent about the pla­tic grip and knob, but other­wise the pen­cil feels solid and balan­ced. The build qua­lity is top-​notch and the Rising Sun color I choo­sed looks astoun­ding. The mecha­nism works quite reassu­rin­gly. I was thin­king it would be like a pro­pel­ling pen­cil, but the knob only rota­tes a limi­ted amount of turn and in one-​direction only and yet works sur­prin­sin­gly well.

    The only thing am not much of a fan thou, is the refil­ling pro­cess. You prac­ti­cally have to dis­as­sem­ble the whole thing to get to the reser­voir. Lead size is not going to be fo your liking (0.7) but it doesn’t bother me.

    All in all, I don’t reg­ret my pruch­ase. BTW as a cul­tu­ral note, Grif­fel trans­la­tes to Grifo in Spa­nish, at long last I will remem­ber the name of the damn pen­cil! LOL

    I’m cur­rious about the TRX, may give it a try. Will report back if I get my hands on it.

  9. Alui­sio Fernandes:

    Yes, that’s really ama­zing! The old ones are indeed expen­sive, and while the MICROGRAPH F 0.5 mm and 0.7 mm can be found now and then, it’s rather dif­fi­cult to get one in 0.3 mm (let alone with a bar­rel that’s not discoloured).

    This post on X con­firms my impres­sion that the knur­ling on the F 770 1x N is much finer. 

    The 925 25 9x is in great demand among coll­ec­tors, and maybe they’ll notice and do a new release.

    Guil­lermo de la Maza:

    Thank you for sha­ring your impres­sion of the Dreh­grif­fel! The refill pro­cess sounds really annoy­ing. – The orange hue used for “rising sun” is very appealing!

    By the way, do you know the Mono­cle edi­tion?

    “Grifo” is great :-)

  10. Yes, the Mono­cle edi­tion caught my eye because it’s all metal. I might give it a try at some point. I know you are not a fan of thick lead, but wouldn’t you be able to replace the inner mecha­nism with an 0.5mm variant?

    I under­stand Schmidt manu­fac­tures such a replacement.

  11. I’m pretty sure there’s a way to turn it into a mecha­ni­cal pen­cil, but in this case I’d rather use the ball­point ver­sion and buy a Jet­stream refill. – Yes, there will cer­tainly be some­thing sui­ta­ble from Schmidt.

Kommentar verfassen

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. – Die Angabe von Name, E-Mail und Website ist freiwillig.

Nach oben scrollen